Wednesday 13 August 2014



Sonic Imperfections at The Montague Tuesday 12-08-14 - by P Budgie for Treedown Gotobed

They keep telling us New Cross is the next Shoreditch , sandwiched by Peckham and Deptford, it is edgy; aka rough on the Old Kent Road.But this monthly event is worth travelling into SE London's nastier recesses to see some wonderful arty music acts that hover on the line between daftly pretentious and innovatively beautiful. Think 1977 and Bowie's release of Low. Side 1 was all crashing drums and clever lyrics like "Always Crashing in the Same Car" and that masterpiece about writers block , "Sound and Vision". Then there was side 2. A burgeoning punk rocker at the time, I hated it. Now its my favourite record of all time. Philip Glass has written an orchestral composition  based on it, now released on CD. And a supergroup of musos has also released their version of the Low / Heroes ambient pieces by Eno & Bowie. What is it , 35 years later and those records are still reverberating around the music world. You have to admit, if Bowie was still based in Beckenham, he would be a Sonic Imperfections regular, always greedily consuming the new; Neu, Can, Kraftwerk etc.
None of the bands are to this standard, but the best, Iyatra Quartet were magnificently well drilled and developed some delightful melodies, with no electronica in sight. Just cello, violin, guitar and drums.They are a must see.
Last night featured three different acts, the old world instrumentation of Laura Cannell. The voice music of Georgina Brett, using effects to make her voice a weird instrument. Pyne Mwamba Duo both played vibes with wah wah pedal, effects and unusual bowing and and blowing into the amplification. It was sometimes laughable, but mostly the music was slow and atmospheric, and when they stopped pounding, it was frequently melodic and interesting with an arresting, sudden beauty springing out of the strange loops and noises. It was like looking at clouds on the horizon, and fleetingly seeing a stunning red sunset burst through the greyness. 
These are the nights when musicians let themselves go. Laugh all you like, in the end you may miss something extraordinary.

Next Sept 9th - Julia Mascetti, Alison J Blunt (tbc) and Collectress

Sunday 10 August 2014

Breaking Bad - were the protagonists paid that badly ? P Budgie for Treedown Gotobed - 10 -08-14

People are still debating the merits and problems that arise from the actions and consequences of our heroes - Walt and Jesse. What a fabulous work - how to use the episodic format of TV to its limits. Take time, let the characters develop, let them develop histories while we watch. If a new viewer has missed a series, you best go and catch up. These guy may inspire love and devotion, or loathing and repulsion. It depends on you. They do bad things. They cook a horrible addictive drug that lays waste to people in  quick time. Walts wife Skylar is a great totem of changing values and tolerance of terrible things in the name of her family. Jesse becomes a self-loathing mess, apparently on the brink of tears thoughout the final series. Which is a shame because he is the most human and in many ways, lovable of everyone wencounter. It is Hank, the apparent doofus, forever lowering the tone of family gatherings, who ultimately outwits them all.
Credibilty is stretched somewhat beyond the limits but we accept and carry on watching. What about the storming of horrible drug dealing psychopath Tocus HQ by Walt in series 2 ? That would have been suicide. Come on. And as for the remote controlled machine gun, auto massacring the badies after a remarkable piece of parking by Walt near the conclusion...really...that is just daft. But nevertheless, the whole thing is a triumph that so many of us love to bits.
Anthony Hopkins wrote it was the best acted thing he had ever seen. Only The Wire can come near it in terms of compulsion to watch the box set in one sitting.
And it flourished in popularity through word of mouth. The way it was shown on British TV was scandalous. Minority channel FX picked it up and proceeded to show it at graveyard spots.So most of us have gone out of our way to find it, download it, beg or borrow it. Talk about having the world at your feet, Bryan Cranston won so many acting awards he must have become the object of envy in the profession. Fashion photoshoots, interviews, Malcolm in the Middle reruns, Cranston was set to dominate like a Clooney or Pitt. So what does he do ? Godzilla followed by Cold Comes the Night. The less said about the former the better. But the thiller with a cool title in which he plays a nasty East European gangster is horribly cliched. You must have been offered better ? And Aaron Paul,doing Need for Speed ? These films are just so execrable they defy comment. Teenage? It probably only appeals to the younger teens who may not be allowed into the cinema to see it, if it is a 14 cert. If not , it must be truly, trlu really lame.
Fellas - time to fire the agent and get yourselves into some more quality stuff before you blow all the goodwill you have accrued. Cranston, you should have grabbed The Counsellor lead , you would have made a lot of difference to what should have been a great movie. Aaron PAul - beware the TV shows you go on - Top Gear is a laugh but the Star in the Car is always a nitemare. Too many mistakes fellas, you would have been mincemeat in Alburquerque by now.

Thursday 7 August 2014

The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt - rvw by P Budgie for Treedown Gotobed blogspot

Donna Tartt does not churn them out - this is her third novel published in the last 30 years - The Secret History announced the literary sensation to the world in 1992 - selling 5m odd copies. In the 760 pages of the hardback edition of her latest work, she is attempting to deal with many weighty subjects of the day, which is not easy. Our world is changing ever faster with the development of communication technology. When you consider the works referred to in The Goldfinch it is apparent she is aiming high from the company she seeks to keep. The picture itself is a masterwork by an obscure Flemish artist - Fabritius - who is the direct link between Rembrandt and Vermeer. The book itself uses the caged bird as an emblem in the same way as Keats, Shelley and Blake;
To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour
But a robin redbreast in a cage
Puts all heaven in a rage...
As for prose, there is clearly one book this must be compared to; Dostoyevsky's The Idiot. She alludes to it as the tale nears its conclusion in the same place it begins - Xmas time Amsterdam. "Well, Idiot was very disturbing book to me," says central character, Russian moral loose canon Boris. The ensuing discussion summarises the Idiot's theme; to do good does not always mean good things will result. How much more difficult are these moral dilemmas in 2014 than they were in 1860, 1950 or any other time in history. The Goldfinch is based around a morally questionable act, the taking of a masterpiece from the MOMA in the chaos and debris following an explosion in the bookshop. This is the only time the book reflects that most 21st century threat, the third world terrorist destroying buildings and inevitably killing strangers in the name of religion.
The characters are all such 21st century beings, our teenage narrator, Theo, struggles terribly. His attachment to Boris results in endless drinking, thieving, and girl obsessions. Only Hobie, the furniture and art restorer to whose orbit our narrator is drawn, represents past centuries' certainties; working the wood and grain of a table leg, re-varnishing a picture in the same way it's always been done, even with a hint of a cheat to make it look older than it is, perhaps concealed within his work. Theo, travels from NYC and trust fund wealth to a weird and wild few years with Boris his only friend, living on the fringes of the desert with his father, who is making a shaky living as a gambler in the casinos of Las Vegas. And then back to New York, to be reunited with the security and social stultification of The Barbours, who take him in as an orphan, and an engagement to one of the offspring. And all the while the stolen painting lurks in the background, stashed away, hopefully safe from damage, debt collectors and dodgy teenagers.
The explosion not only has the effect of giving Theo the eponymous masterpiece, he also loses his life's one real constant, his rock; his mother. Its third consequence is to introduce him to his life's love - the young girl at it's time - Pippa.
Theo becomes a drug addict almost by accident, pecking at a snatched bag of pills like they were smarties - how about a red one ? or a green one? And his beloved painting becomes mixed up in the shady world of drug deals, sex deals and people deals that go on in the realms of today's dark side. The one ever constant in this world of shifting sands, rough seas, of betrayal, double dealing and dishonesty, is the things, the art we leave behind. For some, life becomes entwined with the preservation of these objects of desire and beauty. But to the work of art, to The Goldfinch,and the artists that create them, we are mere ciphers of the future.

Here's a couple of extracts from this tremendous page turner..The first is almost thrown away , nothing much is happening, but Theo is in the midst of drug withdrawal and some of the certainties on which his self confidence depends have been whisked from under him, like a table cloth pulled so fast it leaves all the cups and saucers still standing on the table, but the tall glasses are wobbling precariously . This paragraph is magic, its sweep a microcosm of the vast array of human experience, works and thought that is touched on in the book, pointing to the infinities Blake may be referring to in the poem quoted above.


This second page is another lovely example of Donna Tartt's talent of bringing a clever idea about art into the centre of the action, without any feeling you are in a digression. This idea that all great art touches you on a personal level is so skilfully delivered. And how true it is of books like this one, as well as bands, plays, poems, songs. They speak to you . Tolstoy would regularly hold the action in War and Peace while he inserted long essay about military tactics. Dostoyevsky similarly would divert from the narrative to insert passages about ideology. That other great tome known to all graduates of American Literature, Moby Dick, has chapters devoted purely to the various processes that were part of the whaling profession in the 18th century. Tartt repeats herself slightly in the enjoyable last 10 pages that act as a summary of ideas. The action has concluded to all intents. The delightful piece on the way The Goldfinch has been created, the use of the brush and the blunt, scalpel like application of some of the paint, has already been discussed in Horst's drug den, in a joyously intellectual and knowledgeable level at odds with the environment. But I enjoyed the analysis of the work so much, I was happy to read it again.

Having finished the 760 pages in about three weeks, I immediately returned to the beginning to start again. My main objective was to find out when you first learn the sex of the narrator. I still cannot identify anything within the first ten pages. You try.