Spanish Matador of 20th century Art could give you Eternal Life, but he may also give you the longest lingering Death
" I hate Picasso !" So begin quite a few conversations. If I am holding forth on one my Mastermind specialist subjects; The works of Benny Hill 1992 - 2002 say, or the career of David Bowie 1972 - 1977, someone invariably fancies having a little nip, a tickle around my tender parts to see if I will bite. Why would I ? You are allowed to hate him; he was a bully and a control freak. Misogynist ? Hmmm, he loved women and hated them. His career can be analyzed in terms of his muses, one woman followed another, from 1917 to his death in Mougins in 1973. The women rarely lasted a decade and once a newer, younger model had her feet on the chaise-long, the other woman was on her way out. He was a bastard and he didn't hide it, just take a look at the 1932 masterpiece Nude, Green Leaves and Bust at the Tate .
Marie Therese Walter(MTW) is in, but she is in deep. Picasso depicts her as voluptuous; curves, bosoms and dirty thoughts. This stupendous picture shows her entwined in ribbons, wrapped up like a toy girl for Pablo to play with. The dark shadow of a face dominates the outlines, Picasso has her under control, and it aint pretty. There is a decent Marie-Therese Walter portrait here, but not a notable example; no double face or malignant menace to be detected. Just MTW in profile, bright, uncomplicated in composition and colour, just straight yellow hair. Is boredom setting in? Is the glass half empty, not half full?
This show starts so well I thought we were in for a real treat. The early years are fascinating, when he moved from the bohemian haunts of Barcelona and his hangout Els 4 Gats, to Paris and the outright filthy demi-monde of Pigalle, Montmartre, Aristide Bruant, Toulouse Lautrec, the Moulin Rouge and La Bateau Lavoir. Still finding himself as an artist, he sketched funny cartoons and daft doodles which are dubiously shown here. The self-portraits of 1896 and 1906 shown together, tell a tale of hard living and lost hair. The blue period is marvelously represented with one of the real blockbuster pieces of the show. A swarthy man of high forehead and thick mustache looks straight at us with imperious self confidence, while his malnourished companion looks forlornly miserable behind his shoulder. All in a nocturne blue wash that spoke of debauchery, long nights of voyeurism and absinthe drinking, visits to Maisons-Closes after another riotous night at Le Chat Noir or Lapin Agile.
Next - Olga Kholklova gets her own room with three masterpieces telling the sorry tale. Portrait#1 is pure and beautiful, Olga looks like a classic Russian aristocrat with the hair parted and short, a la mode and ready to Charleston or Cha Cha Cha. Diaghlevs prima ballerina married Picasso, had his son Paulo, who is seen in a short film where they play in the garden. Portrait #2 is more stylized, the feel is slightly surreal, something isnt right. Portrait #3 is the killer. MTW has come along, she must have seen the pictures her husband was producing while out on his daily stroll around the Boulevards and cafes of Paris, and then to the studio, no doubt for hours and hours. The coup de grace, Portrait #3 shows ashen faced Olga with eyes popping, the ridiculous hat perched on a featureless face, perched on a neck that curves like Mount Fuji to a point, upon which the head seems to have lost contact and now could topple off any second. Imagine how she felt when she saw it, next to all those sex stuffed portraits of his mistress and mother to his child, Maya.
"Ive dispatched you Olga. You better go before I lose your head forever..."
This kind of cruelty was also brought to bare on the next woman in the line; Dora Maar. She figures large in the tale, in a sumptuously finished portrait of her sitting in a chair, anguish apparent n her body language, eyes looking one way, the rest of the face going the other. Its as if she has turned her head mid-portrait, like a long exposure photo. Dora is memorable as the thin, nervy companion of the war years, famous as The Weeping Woman, did she know this would be her epitaph? She is also the subject of a sculpture of high quality which is a more generous portrayal.
Picasso has produced some ugly pieces - two more are in the final room which is a hotch potch of post war work. Two good friends are shown in garish and tasteless attire. Lee Miller looks like a 70 year old hag and not the uber swanky war correspondent she was at the time. And Nusch Eluard, wife of his poet friend, seen depicted in a charcoal on paper which is Picasso at his most sophisticated. But the portrait again is ugly and vicious in tone. What did these platonic friends make of their portraits?
Dotted around this last room are pieces of sculpture, ceramics and pottery. Two flat sheet metal pieces show another muse , Sylvie David in profile in another style Ive not seen before. How can you say you dont like Picasso? You cant possibly know enough about him and his work to judge, there is so much and so original is it.
We end with a major portrait of Francois Gilot and a large work showing final muse Jacqueline Roque surveying her domain at La Californie in the hills above Cannes. Or is she contemplating eternity, as gifted to her by this Spanish matador of 20th century art. To be his subject is truly to live forever; she knew she would be contemplated by the people of the future, for they all will wonder what she was thinking as Picasso worked on his latest masterpiece, one of over 70 pieces he produced of Roque.
Her predecessor, Francois Gilot gave him Claude and Paloma, she also gave him a run for her money. She was the only woman to leave him. But Jacqueline was assistant, protector , secretary and muse. A large photograph shows them together, with PP teaching the kids how to paint. Another lovely piece shows the same subject, with the mother looking down and spotlighting each child in a blaze of colour - one green, the other blue. Did Pablo go soft and sentimental at the end? I doubt it.
Ambience, Price and Booking ; Two of us got in for £15.50, that was with a concession, no gift aid.
With Artfund card it was £8.50 or thereabouts.
Full price is £17 or £19 with gift aid.
We did not book and got in straight away. It is reasonably spaced out and as I mentioned, only the cubism room was quite full, but by no means packed. There are choke points in between rooms where I (accidentally)shoulder barged a woman of pensionable age and kicked a lady's bag while showing how the charleston is depicted in Three Dancers at the Tate. Beware the silent seventy year olds!